“The same candidate reaches us four ways. Past search, vendor, sourced, applied, and no two agree on how far along she is.”
HiringScout screens resumes, makes the calls and runs the interviews. You get a score, a recording and a transcript for every name.
Screens, calls, and interviews, done for you.
01Requirement
02Sourcing
03Reachout
04Screen
05Interview
“The same candidate reaches us four ways. Past search, vendor, sourced, applied, and no two agree on how far along she is.”
“We re-screen people we already screened. Nobody can tell it is the same person until the interview.”
“Margin dies in the middle. Recruiter hours per placement is the number that decides whether a req was worth taking.”
Four origins merge into one record the moment a duplicate appears, so a vendor submission never restarts her screen.
Every candidate carries one transcript, one recording, one score. She is never asked the same questions twice.
Calls run and score themselves, so your team spends its hours on the shortlist, not on reaching it.
Ranked against a real job, kept, and reached out to, all in one place.
Plain words, not boolean. One search covers every source you have and comes back ranked against a real job, yours or any posting URL.
Finding the person is the easy half. The same place scores the results, keeps who you passed on and does the follow-up.
The number always points back to why.
Runners-up stay in your pool and re-rank on their own.
Email, message and call, all sent from your own domain.
SARA calls in their own hours and files a scored transcript before you open the record.
Code they explain, a design they defend, real questions on behaviour and fit. One scorecard, every number backed by the transcript.
SARA “Walk me through the retry logic you added. What was failing before it?”
Orders arrive in nightly batches and the same order id can appear more than once.
Return every id that repeats, in the order it was first seen again. The batch can hold 50k rows.
# repeated order ids in tonight's batch def dupes(orders): seen, out = set(), [] for o in orders: if o.id in seen: out.append(o.id) seen.add(o.id) return out
// repeated order ids in tonight's batch func Dupes(orders []Order) []int64 { seen := make(map[int64]bool, len(orders)) out := []int64{} for _, o := range orders { if seen[o.ID] { out = append(out, o.ID) } seen[o.ID] = true } return out }
Executing…
Sketch order status lookups at a hundred reads per write.
Say where the read goes, and what happens when that node is gone.
SARA “One primary and no read path. Where does the status lookup go when it fails over?”
Thank you for your time. You may close this window.
You are never buying the whole suite to fill one seat.
As many rounds as the role needs, with your own interviewers. Every room opens with the AI round already read.
Send finalists for checks from the screen you shortlist on. Results land on the record as they clear.
A full applicant tracking layer, for when you'd rather run hiring here than push candidates back out to another system.
Everyone opens the same pipeline and sees only the slice their role covers. No exports, no stale copies, no seats to buy.
No inbox, no spreadsheet. Vendor candidates run your rounds. You can finally say which vendor was worth the fee.
Connect once and posting, outreach and notifications run through the tools you already use.
They're not asked to. The AI round happens before you submit, so it's how you decide what to send. Your client gets a human recommendation with a transcript behind it.
A human reviews every interview outcome before it reaches your client.
Yes. Each client is its own record with its own roles and candidates. A recruiter on two accounts sees two pipelines, and nothing crosses between them.
Per-customer context. Scoped access per recruiter.
Count what you're replacing, not adding. Sourcing, outreach, screening and coding assessments are four line items today. This is one price, whole team, no per-job fee.
Pay for what you use. No seats to buy, nothing to sign.
You send the evidence with the person. Every submit carries a transcript, a recording and a scored rubric, so the client compares a record, not your adjectives.
Share a candidate's full record with one link.
Don't. An ATS stores what happened. This produces the evidence your ATS then stores. They do different jobs, and yours keeps doing its one.
Works standalone, or alongside the ATS, Slack, Discord and calendar you already open.
Because you can open it. Every number points at the moment in the transcript that earned it. If you disagree with a score, you can see which answer it was reading and say so.
Scored competencies, each traceable to a written anchor and a timestamp.
A transcript, a recording, a scored rubric and a recommendation, plus the questions left open, so your round starts where the AI stopped.
Ready to share with your team or push straight into your ATS.
About ten minutes. Paste a job description or a posting URL, check the questions it drafts, and publish. Sourcing and screening start from there.
No implementation, no onboarding call required.
Better than a seat model does. Roles open per engagement, screen against that stack, and close when it ships. You pay for the screening you ran, not a licence you carry between projects.
Usage-based. Roles open and close with the engagement.
Yes. Screening doesn't need a posted job. Run a round against a role you haven't opened, keep the scored records, and re-rank the pool when a real engagement lands.
Standalone screening. Pools re-score against any new role.
Bring them in as vendors. They submit into the same pipeline on the same bar, see only their own candidates, and get scored on who they send, not how many.
Per-firm caps. Duplicates turned away automatically.
Code is written and run in the language the role calls for, and the design round is a whiteboard the candidate draws on and defends. No multiple choice anywhere.
Live execution. One recording, one transcript, one score.
The session is proctored end to end with the whole screen shared. Every flag lands on the record with a timestamp, and nothing ends a round on its own. You judge what it was worth.
Every flag lands on the record, with a timestamp.
No, that's the round this replaces. Your engineers join once there's something to argue about, with the AI round already read and the open questions listed.
Company rounds start where the AI round stopped.
No. Transcripts, recordings and scores are encrypted in transit and at rest, every action is audit-logged, and none of it trains a model. Deletion requests reach you, not a black box.
Encrypted in transit and at rest. Full audit trail.
Nothing on a term. You pay for what you use, with no seats to buy and no contract to sign. Add-ons switch on per role and off again after it.
No seat licences. No minimum term.
Usually four. Sourcing, outreach, screening and the coding-assessment vendor. Most bill per seat or per job today. This is one usage line for the same work.
One line item, whole team, no per-job fee.
Every charge is itemised against the job and candidate it was spent on, so a month's usage reads as a list of roles filled, not one opaque platform fee.
Per-role, per-candidate usage history.
That's the common case. Publish the role and sourcing, outreach, screening and scheduling run on their own. You come back to a ranked shortlist with the reasoning attached.
About ten minutes to set up a role.
You are, and the record shows why. Nothing auto-hires. A resume that misses your bar can be screened out automatically, but every interview outcome and hire decision has a human on it.
Every hire decision has a human on it, logged.
They pick their slot, get a callback if they miss it, and can read the transcript afterwards. The round carries your role and your bar, not a generic quiz.
Rescheduling and follow-up handled automatically.
Not the interview. It produces a transcript, a recording and a scored rubric, and a person at the company decides from that. A resume can be screened out automatically if it clearly misses the stated requirements, like any ATS filter would. Every interview and hire decision is a human call.
A human decides your interview outcome, every time.
Pick another. You choose your slot, get a callback if you miss it, and rescheduling doesn't cost you your place.
Self-serve scheduling and rescheduling.
Nothing to start. Every account includes a resume check, a practice interview and job alerts for free, and you only pay if you want more. Your record is yours, and a deletion request reaches a person.
Free to start. Deletion on request.
About ten minutes to set up. Pay for what you use. No seats to buy, and nothing to sign.