“The same candidate reaches us four ways. Past search, vendor, sourced, applied, and no two agree on how far along she is.”
HiringScout screens the resumes, makes the calls, and runs the interviews. You get the assessment, the recording, and the transcript behind every name.
Screens, calls, and interviews, done for you.
01Requirement
02Sourcing
03Reachout
04Screen
05Interview
“The same candidate reaches us four ways. Past search, vendor, sourced, applied, and no two agree on how far along she is.”
“We re-screen people we already screened. Nobody can tell it is the same person until the interview.”
“Margin dies in the middle. Recruiter hours per placement is the number that decides whether a req was worth taking.”
Four origins merge on name, email, phone and work history the moment the second record appears, so a vendor submission never restarts a screen she already sat through.
Every candidate carries one transcript, one recording, one score. She is never asked the same questions twice.
Screening calls run unattended and score themselves, so your team spends its hours on the shortlist, not on reaching it.
Ranked against a real job, kept, and reached out to, all in one place.
Plain words, not boolean. One query goes across every source you have and comes back ranked against a real job, either one of yours or any posting URL you paste in.
Finding the person is the easy half. The same place that runs the search also scores it, keeps who you passed on, and does the following up.
The number always points back to why.
Runners-up stay in your pool and re-rank on their own.
Email, message and call, all sent from your own domain.
SARA calls in their daytime hours and files a scored transcript before you open the record.
Code they explain, a design board they defend, real questions on behaviour and fit. One scorecard, every number citing the line that earned it.
You are never buying the whole suite to fill one seat.
Run your own interviews after the AI round, as many as the role needs, with your interviewers and your panel. Every room opens with the AI call already read.
Send finalists for employment, education and identity checks from the same screen you shortlist from. Results land on the record as they clear.
The full applicant tracking layer, with pipelines, stages, notes and team access, for when you would rather run hiring here than push candidates back out to another system.
A U.S. government ID is checked before the interview opens, so the person who took the round is provably the person you shortlisted.
Everyone opens the same pipeline and sees exactly the slice their role covers. No exports, no stale copies, no seats to buy.
No inbox, no spreadsheet. Vendor candidates run your rounds. You can finally say which vendor was worth the fee.
Connect once, and posting, outreach and notifications all run through the tools your team already opens.
They're not being asked to. The AI round happens before your submit, because it's how you decide what to send. What reaches your client is a human recommendation with a transcript behind it, which is more than they get from you today.
A human reviews every interview outcome before it reaches your client.
Each client is its own customer record with its own roles, its own context and its own candidates. A recruiter working two accounts sees two pipelines, never one merged pile, and nothing crosses between them.
Per-customer context. Scoped access per recruiter.
Then count what you're replacing, not what you're adding. Sourcing, outreach, screening and the coding assessment are four line items today, and most of them charge per seat or per job. This is one price, whole team, no per-job fee.
Pay for what you use. No seats to buy, nothing to sign.
You send the evidence with the person. Every submit carries a transcript, a recording and a scored rubric, so the client is comparing your candidate against a record rather than against your adjectives.
Share a candidate's full record with one link.
Don't. An ATS is a system of record. It stores what happened. This is a system of judgement; it produces the evidence your ATS then stores. They do different jobs, and yours keeps doing its one.
Works standalone, or alongside the ATS, Slack, Discord and calendar you already open.
Because you can open it. Every candidate is scored against the rubric you wrote, and every number points at the moment in the transcript that earned it. If you disagree with a call, you can see exactly which answer it was reading, and say so.
Scored competencies, each traceable to a written anchor and a timestamp.
A transcript, a recording, a scored rubric, and a recommendation, plus the questions the interview couldn't settle, so your human round starts where the AI stopped instead of re-asking everything.
Ready to share with your team or push straight into your ATS.
About ten minutes for the first one. Paste a job description or a posting URL, check the questions it drafts, and publish. Sourcing and screening start from that, not from a configuration project.
No implementation, no onboarding call required.
It fits better than a seat model does. Roles are opened per engagement, screened against that engagement's stack, and closed when it ships. You pay for the screening you ran, not for a headcount licence you carry between projects.
Usage-based. Roles open and close with the engagement.
Yes. Screening does not require a posted job. Run a round against a role you have not opened, keep the scored records in your pool, and re-rank the whole pool the moment a real engagement lands.
Standalone screening. Pools re-score against any new role.
Bring them in as vendors. They submit into the same pipeline on the same bar, see only their own candidates, and get scored on the people they actually send rather than on how many they sent.
Per-firm caps. Duplicates turned away automatically.
Code is actually written and run in the language the role calls for, and the design round is an actual whiteboard the candidate draws on and defends. There is no multiple choice anywhere in it.
Live execution. One recording, one transcript, one score.
The session is proctored end to end and the whole screen is shared before it opens. Every flag lands on the record with its timestamp, and nothing ends a round on its own, so you judge what it was worth.
Optional ID check ties the person to the round.
No, that is the round this replaces. Your engineers join at the point where there is something to argue about, opening the room with the AI round already read and the unresolved questions listed.
Company rounds start where the AI round stopped.
No. Transcripts, recordings and scores are encrypted in transit and at rest, every action is audit-logged, and none of it trains a model. Deletion requests reach you, not a black box.
Encrypted in transit and at rest. Full audit trail.
Nothing on a term. You pay for what you use, there are no seats to buy, and there is no contract to sign before the first role runs. Add-ons are switched on per role and off again after it.
No seat licences. No minimum term.
Usually four. The sourcing tool, the outreach tool, the screening service and the coding-assessment vendor. Most of them bill per seat or per job today; this is one usage line for the same work.
One line item, whole team, no per-job fee.
Every charge is itemised against the job and the candidate it was spent on, so a month's usage reads as a list of roles you filled rather than one opaque platform fee.
Per-role, per-candidate usage history.
That is the common case. Publish the role, and sourcing, outreach, screening and scheduling run without anybody driving them. You come back to a ranked shortlist with the reasoning attached.
About ten minutes to set up a role.
You are, and the record shows why the decision was made. Nothing auto-hires; a resume that misses your bar can be screened out automatically, but every interview outcome and every hire decision has a human on it, with a transcript underneath it.
Every hire decision has a human on it, logged.
They get a slot they chose, a callback if they miss it, and a transcript they can read afterwards, which is more than most processes give them. The round carries your role and your bar, not a generic quiz.
Rescheduling and follow-up handled automatically.
Not the interview. It produces a transcript, a recording and a scored rubric. A person at the company decides your outcome from that evidence. Your resume can be screened out automatically if it clearly misses a role's stated requirements, the same way an ATS keyword filter would; every interview and every hire decision is a human call.
A human decides your interview outcome, every time.
Pick another one. You choose your own slot, you get a callback if you miss it, and rescheduling does not cost you your place in the process.
Self-serve scheduling and rescheduling.
Nothing to start. Every account includes a resume check, a practice interview and job alerts at no cost, and you only pay if you want more than that. Your record is yours either way, so you can ask for it and have it deleted, and that request reaches a person.
Free to start. Deletion on request.
About ten minutes to set up. Pay for what you use. No seats to buy, and nothing to sign.