Every resume gets read properly against the role you're actually hiring for, and you always see why it landed where it did. Never just a number on its own.
It goes the same way whether someone applied, a vendor sent them, or you uploaded a hundred of them this morning.
Work history, skills, education, and the things that decide whether an interview is even possible: work authorisation, notice period, where they can work from, whether they'd relocate.
What makes a good staff engineer isn't what makes a good first-line support hire, and you get to say which one you're filling. It's measured against that, not against some general idea of a strong resume.
Every score arrives with the evidence behind it, so you can disagree with the reasoning instead of arguing with a verdict.
If someone's missing something the role genuinely needs, a strong resume everywhere else won't quietly paper over it.
This orders your queue. It doesn't make your decision.
Who you actually talk to is still your call, which is the whole reason the reasoning sits there on the screen.
It only knows what made it onto the page.
A resume is what someone says about themselves. None of it is proven until a call or an interview tests it, which is exactly what happens next.
Nobody is being ranked against anybody else.
Each resume is read against your role on its own. One candidate never pushes another one down the list.
Free to try. No credit card, and no credit spent until you ask for work.